Digest
Index


Contact Us

 
 

Special
Reports

 

 Earlier
Digests

21st September

14th September

7th September

31st August

24th August

17th August

10th August

3rd August

27th July

20th July

13th July

6th July

29th June

22nd June

15th June

8th June

1st June

25th May

18th May

11th May

4th May

27th April

20th April

13th April

6th April

30th March

23rd March

16th March

9th March

2nd March

23rd February

16th February

9th February

2nd February

26th January

19th January

12th January

5th January

2013

29th December

22nd December

15th December

8th December

1st December

24th November

17th November

10th November

3rd November

27th October

20th October

13th October

6th October

29th September

22nd September

15th September

8th September

1st September

25th August

18th August

11th August

4th August

28th July

21st July

14th July

7th July

30th June

23rd June

16th June

9th June

2ndJune

 26th May

 19th May

 12th May

 5th May

 28th April

 21st April

 14th April

 7th April

 31st March

 24th March

 17th March

For earler history Read

 

Latest Digest Week Ending 28th September 2014


The trespass consultation response
- this chart omits another 36,000 against the plan to change the law.

UK news highlights

The main stories

Fylde Borough Council on Monday agreed to refuse the application for seismic monitoring at Roseacre (after agreeing a similar application last week). The chairman refused to revisit the earlier decision to make consistency, sadly, despite legal advice it was within his power. Maybe the council has caught on to th fact that the majority of the detectors are to help with Cuadrilla's fracking, NOT to monitor for seismic events, for safety. Whatever the reason for the decision, this conflict of decision now makes the council look incompetent.

The main news of the week came with the announcement that the government was to press ahead with its plan to legalise fracking under your land without your consent. This is a discraceful response to a public consultation which saw 99% of respondees against the plan. Clearly the government has no mandate for chaning the law, and no mandate for fracking. It is now very much open to challenge under international law if it proceeds with its insane plan to frack the UK against the people's will. The CLA was particularly vocal in expressing disatisfaction with the government decision.



Other news

Ineos boss Jim Radcliffe promised to deliver a package of benefits for madowners and local communities. The plan was widely seen as signs of more desperation, more bribery.

Elsewhere

Yet another new report came in of a study finding fracking wastewater was still too toxic, even after treatment.


Any opinions here not quotes from the week's news reports are my own.
Alan Tootill

News As It Came In with links to original stories

Who picks up the pieces if fracking causes damage? asks CLA

Study Finds Treated Fracking Wastewater Still Too Toxic

British firm Ineos accused of ‘bribes and bulldozers’ approach to fracking

Fracking under homes: 99 per cent opposed to law change

  Links to other
anti-fracking sites